< Return to results listing

Pushing the Limits of Hydraulic Fracturing in Russia (SPE 90357)


Yukos transitioned from sand and small diameter ceramic to 12/20 and 16/30 mesh ceramic proppant.  Oil production rates increased tremendously in 16 larger treatments with improved fracture conductivity.  Future plans will incorporate 8/12 and higher quality ceramics, with expectation to again double productivity.


We have established the concept of Unified Fracture Design (UFD) to maximize the dimensionless productivity index (JD) following a hydraulic fracture treatment. For a given mass of proppant there is a specific dimensionless fracture conductivity, which we called the optimum, at which the JD becomes maximum. The Proppant Number is a seminal quantity unifying the propped fracture and the drainage volumes and the two permeabilities, those of the proppant pack and the reservoir.

For each injected proppant mass there is a corresponding Proppant Number and, at the optimum conductivity, the dimensionless PI can be readily determined. Increasing the proppant mass or the proppant-pack permeability would result in an increase in the JD, which has a maximum limit of approximately 1.9. In a recent publication we have shown how to push the limits in hydraulic fracturing by injecting very large volumes of proppant of very large retained permeability.

There are physical constraints to our approach, one of which is an upper limit of the net pressure resulting from both the physical limitations of injection equipment and tubulars but also from the need to prevent undesirable fracture height migration. However, the use of much larger proppant pack permeability leads to a correspondingly smaller width for the same fracture conductivity. The smaller width requirement allows the injection of far larger proppant masses before the net pressure constraints are met. This is a departure from current industry practices, which are aimed to “save” injection costs for a specific rate. Our approach, in medium to high permeability formations is to maximize the rate within the injection constraints. Rudimentary economics suggest that such treatments pay for themselves in just a few days of incremental production.

We present here field case studies and results showing the application and success of our design approach.

Author(s): M.J. Economides, A.S. Demarchos, U. of Houston; J.M. Mach, J. Rueda, D.S. Wolcott, Yukos

Paper Number: SPE 90357

URL: https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-90357-MS


Stay connected with technology updates and news.